First and foremost the current Secretary of Science has done a horrible job and is a very weak competitor and strategist. When choosing a lead seat for a position smarts and brains is not enough. You need a leader and a competitor. African Americans are usually very strong at competition and very strong at leadership skills as an inherit gene in the majority of them that is raised and ingrained in them to battle. Along with that the biggest need of science is food. And the Current Science director has not spent any time on world food science issues. But has spent a lot of time trying to get the US to give over its science secrets and competitive edge to Communist China.
Therefore a natural good chose for the minority party would be to chose an African in our lead most important chair. He should not be sympathetic to racist organizations, nor have any record of being a civil rights fighter. As that is a key issue if we leak high science to specific areas of the populace. Who will not use them for Democracy. Africa is the current best market place for US developmental science trade. Were our business could get mass loads of exports too. Thus raising our economy. Yet Secretary Chu spends predominate time on Communist China. A country that forces over ip secrets and forced joint ventures as per their innovation law. Secretary Chu knows this. Our green technology could easily find whole markets that are very competitive for our business that have no non competitive Communist Chinese threats or to our industries loss of US fresh treasury inflow for needed deficit payments.
An African American Science Director with no racial hate in his background. Would be the best choice for the next semester of our high council of Democracy. As this natural rite of human being is African American populace as a proud American populace not the hater or racist kind. Is a very strong leader and competitive trait in their genomic and social being. This then mean inherently things like what have happened under Secretary Chu's direction will not happen. As obviously he will be thinking about his roots and people like Secretary Chu has. However, he will not be thinking to destroy our industry. He will want to build trade with Africa and our local business.
Theys have the negar speech arsenal and they know how to use it when they feel somebody is doing them wrong, doing theirs wrong or just being darn right weak. In first amendment case law. They speak on the African American culture and the use of hostile words, attitude, and actions that they do when they speak if they are trying to get a point across that is not being heard. And it is scary as hell but it works. As they are raised not to be slaves to anyone and fight those that try and do wrong to them or theirs. So they get very hostile vocal. And many first amendment cases of possible speech to people have been defended with culture integrity. As that is their culture and the majority act like that. Just like Europeans if they speak hostile make sure they say a disclaimer in their speech. As that is the case law on that matter. I am not an attorney so do not use this paragraph as law.
Rider I
Therefore a natural good chose for the minority party would be to chose an African in our lead most important chair. He should not be sympathetic to racist organizations, nor have any record of being a civil rights fighter. As that is a key issue if we leak high science to specific areas of the populace. Who will not use them for Democracy. Africa is the current best market place for US developmental science trade. Were our business could get mass loads of exports too. Thus raising our economy. Yet Secretary Chu spends predominate time on Communist China. A country that forces over ip secrets and forced joint ventures as per their innovation law. Secretary Chu knows this. Our green technology could easily find whole markets that are very competitive for our business that have no non competitive Communist Chinese threats or to our industries loss of US fresh treasury inflow for needed deficit payments.
An African American Science Director with no racial hate in his background. Would be the best choice for the next semester of our high council of Democracy. As this natural rite of human being is African American populace as a proud American populace not the hater or racist kind. Is a very strong leader and competitive trait in their genomic and social being. This then mean inherently things like what have happened under Secretary Chu's direction will not happen. As obviously he will be thinking about his roots and people like Secretary Chu has. However, he will not be thinking to destroy our industry. He will want to build trade with Africa and our local business.
Theys have the negar speech arsenal and they know how to use it when they feel somebody is doing them wrong, doing theirs wrong or just being darn right weak. In first amendment case law. They speak on the African American culture and the use of hostile words, attitude, and actions that they do when they speak if they are trying to get a point across that is not being heard. And it is scary as hell but it works. As they are raised not to be slaves to anyone and fight those that try and do wrong to them or theirs. So they get very hostile vocal. And many first amendment cases of possible speech to people have been defended with culture integrity. As that is their culture and the majority act like that. Just like Europeans if they speak hostile make sure they say a disclaimer in their speech. As that is the case law on that matter. I am not an attorney so do not use this paragraph as law.
Rider I
No comments:
Post a Comment